I do know that the channel between two friends could be both introduced or unannounced. Nevertheless, even when the channel is publicly introduced, the steadiness of the channel is just not revealed. So far as I do know, this can be a concern for Lightning Community routing effectivity.
Why cannot a peer decide out of this privateness constraint (with the settlement of the opposite peer) and reveal the steadiness to enhance routing and community effectivity? Revealing the channel’s steadiness reduces privateness, however a well-connected peer may benefit economically by doing so.
For example, a big LN node belonging to an trade could be very more likely to conform to this. They might achieve extra financial advantages and have little to no privateness issues since they’re already well-known. If they do not care about privateness, this is able to be a win-win state of affairs.
It’s mainly promoting your data to realize extra money.
I do know that the channel between two friends could be both introduced or unannounced. Nevertheless, even when the channel is publicly introduced, the steadiness of the channel is just not revealed. So far as I do know, this can be a concern for Lightning Community routing effectivity.
Why cannot a peer decide out of this privateness constraint (with the settlement of the opposite peer) and reveal the steadiness to enhance routing and community effectivity? Revealing the channel’s steadiness reduces privateness, however a well-connected peer may benefit economically by doing so.
For example, a big LN node belonging to an trade could be very more likely to conform to this. They might achieve extra financial advantages and have little to no privateness issues since they’re already well-known. If they do not care about privateness, this is able to be a win-win state of affairs.
It’s mainly promoting your data to realize extra money.
